Sample report · Justice & Public Safety
We re-derived a published figure from the public record.
California's corrections department reports a 39.1 percent three-year recidivism rate for the FY2019-20 release cohort — and the report reconstructs it exactly: (7,567 felony + 5,828 misdemeanor convictions) ÷ 34,215 tracked = 39.15%. The same people over the same three years also measure 64.2% by arrest and 17.4% by return-to-prison — a 47-point spread that comes entirely from the definition, all three published by the same department.
The situation
One cohort, three published rates, and a program table with honest caveats.
A legislative budget subcommittee reviews corrections outcomes: the department publishes cohort recidivism under three definitions, program-completion outcomes, and an independent legislative analyst has questioned whether program effectiveness can be assessed at all.
We entered the published cohort counts and program-achievement figures, and had the report reconstruct the published rates, show the definition sensitivity, and label every completer-versus-non-completer comparison as an association — not a causal program effect.
What we supplied
Only public inputs — each one sourced.
Inputs come from the department's statewide recidivism report and its program-achievements companion (FY2019-20 cohort), plus the legislative analyst's 2017 program review.
| Input | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Released / tracked cohort | 34,493 / 34,215 (278 excluded — no rap sheet) | CDCR statewide report |
| 3-yr conviction rate (primary) | 39.1% (7,567 felony + 5,828 misdemeanor) | CDCR statewide report |
| 3-yr arrest / return-to-prison | 64.2% / 17.4% | CDCR statewide report |
| Prior cohorts | 47.6% → 44.6% → 41.9% → 39.1% | CDCR report series |
| Education achievers' conviction rate | 27.7% vs 39.9% without (−12.2 pts) | CDCR program report |
| Career-technical achievers | 26.0% vs 40.0% without (−14.0 pts) | CDCR program report |
| LAO program review (2017) | ~$315M funding; ~$10K per participant-year; effectiveness "impossible to assess" | LAO report 3720 |
Source: CDCR Statewide Recidivism Report, FY2019-20 cohort · download the source document we used.
The report
The finished, board-ready output.
This is the actual rendered report — interactive charts and all. Nothing was edited after generation.
Reconcile
Our output vs. the published figures.
| Metric | Published | Ours (computed) | Match | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Published conviction rate | 39.1% (CDCR) | (7,567 + 5,828) ÷ 34,215 = 39.15% | ✓ exact | All four cohorts reconstruct the same way |
| Definition spread | All three rates (CDCR) | 17.4% → 39.1% → 64.2% — 46.8 points | ✓ exact | Same people, same window; the definition does the work |
| Credential ladder | Per-credential rates (CDCR) | Associate degree 5.6% · bachelor's/master's 0.0% (n=19) | ✓ | Labeled as associations, not causal effects — participants differ from non-participants |
The two-denominator nuance is stated wherever rates are compared: arrest and conviction rates use the 34,215 tracked cohort; the return-to-prison rate uses all 34,493 released. Time-to-case-resolution and post-program employment require court and wage-record data that departmental reporting doesn't publish — disclosed, not estimated.
Build the same report from your own numbers.
You supply the figures you already have, and every number comes back labeled by where it came from — so you can put your name on it and show your work.
Generate your report, $199